That was some truly horrendous car control

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 04/25/2019 at 17:38 • Filed to: None

2

17

OpposResidentLexusGuy - USE20, XF20, XU30 and Press Cars > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:44

9

Bahahah

PatBateman > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:46

5

Honda driver was being an asshole, decided to show his displeasure that the Sprinter van changed lanes in front of him, exaggerated the swing back to the left lane as displeasure display, and that’s when keeping it real went wrong.

Hopefully, no injuries. 

farscythe - makin da cawfee! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:46

1

impressive..

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > PatBateman 04/25/2019 at 17:47

9

It looks like the Sprinter van indicated and made a safe lane change, possibly even with the purpose of getting out of the Honda’s way. Then the Honda made an unsafe serve with no signal, cutting into the van’s lane change. So I wouldn’t even put the van at fault for the cut- off.

This is what we'll show whenever you publish anything on Kinja: > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:49

4

They never read the visor.

McMike > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:49

4

PatBateman > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:50

1

Yeah, the van didn’t do anything wrong.  Honda Hot Head (“Triple H”) was the only party that holds any fault whatsoever. 

boredalways > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 17:57

2

I hope there was only the driver in the CR-V, because no one else deserves to suffer their bad habits and incompetence.

Goggles Pizzano > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 18:00

1

Never prepare for impact by bracing yourself with your r ight foot on the fire wall .

vicali > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 18:00

2

Can’t Really - Veer..

fintail > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 18:04

1

Old top heavy tall narrow SUVlets are a bad choice for aggressive maneuvers.

Highlander-Datsuns are Forever > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 19:30

1

I C RV what you did there.

Urambo Tauro > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 19:58

3

It almost looks like the van waited an excessively long time to return to the right lane after passing, but I think that’s an optical illusion. D ashcam footage is often distorted to where it looks like there was a lot of room , and I’m trying not to fall for tha t here. My guess is that the van did everything right: giving some room before merging   so as to not be cutting the camera-car off, signalling BEFORE leaving the lane, and merging smoothly and predictably ... in stark contrast to the Honda.

OPPOsaurus WRX > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 21:21

1

i had to watch that twice.  The first time I thought the drive was ejected and it was them swinging from the front of the Honda.

wafflesnfalafel > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/25/2019 at 21:42

2

that was hilarious - it took quite a bit of effort on their part to get that CRV to do that

ateamfan42 > wafflesnfalafel 04/26/2019 at 08:30

1

it took quite a bit of effort on their part to get that CRV to do that

Absolutely. The alignments on those smaller SUVs are ridiculously biased toward lawy er-approved understeer . Usually 0 camber front, and something like -2 deg rear. Getting THAT to oversteer is no small challenge .

arl > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/28/2019 at 18:53

1

1. I hope the dickhead in the Honda is OK. I really don’t wish harm on people.

2. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!